Pensions on divorce · England & Wales
Sorting out money on divorce comes with a lot of jargon, and pensions have more than their share. Here are the terms you're most likely to meet, explained simply, general information to help you follow what's going on, not legal or financial advice. Still not sure whether the pensions in your case need an expert? Try the free 2-minute check.
Who works out what a pension is really worth, and how they're brought in.
A specialist, usually an actuary or a qualified financial expert, who values the pensions in a divorce and reports on the fairest way to divide them. Because two pensions with the same headline value can be worth very different amounts in real life, a PODE's job is to compare like with like.
One PODE jointly instructed by both parties to produce a single, independent report they both rely on. It keeps costs down and avoids duelling reports, so it's the most common way a PODE is instructed.
A PODE instructed by one party only, to advise privately, for example, to sense-check a joint expert's report or suggest the right questions to ask. They work for one side rather than for both.
The written brief that tells the PODE what to value and what questions to answer. A poorly drafted instruction can produce a report that misses the point, so getting this right matters as much as choosing the expert.
The rules that govern how expert evidence is used in the family courts of England & Wales. Part 25 sets out how an expert like a PODE is appointed and what their report must contain. (Advisory work for one party sits outside the formal court-expert process.)
A group of judges, lawyers, actuaries and financial experts whose good-practice guide, now in its second edition (PAG2), sets the accepted standard for how pensions should be valued and shared on divorce. Much of the terminology on this page comes from it.
The steps and documents you'll come across when splitting finances.
The legal term for the process of dividing money, property and pensions when a marriage or civil partnership ends. It's what "sorting out the finances" is formally called.
The requirement for each person to set out everything they own, owe and earn, fully and honestly, so a fair split can be worked out. Hiding assets can unravel a settlement later.
The standard financial statement each party completes to give full disclosure, income, property, savings, debts and pensions. It's the starting point for almost every financial settlement.
A form sent to a pension provider to gather the detail a court or expert needs about a scheme, the value, the benefits and any special features. It fills the gaps a Form E can't.
A summary of the couple's finances and the proposed split, sent to the court so a judge can check a settlement is fair before approving it. Where pensions are being offset, this is where the reasoning should be recorded.
A written agreement, approved by a judge, that makes a financial settlement legally binding. Without a court order, financial claims can be reopened years later, even after divorce.
The two stages of the divorce itself: the Conditional Order (once called decree nisi) says the court sees no reason you can't divorce, and the Final Order (once decree absolute) legally ends the marriage. A pension share usually can't take effect until the Final Order.
The first court hearing in a contested financial case, used to set out what information and evidence, such as a pension report, is still needed before the case can progress.
A without-prejudice hearing where a judge gives a frank, off-the-record steer on a likely outcome to help both sides reach agreement and avoid a final trial. Most cases settle at or around this stage.
A voluntary process where a neutral, trained mediator helps a couple reach their own agreement on finances and children, without a judge deciding for them. Any agreement is usually then put into a consent order.
Two ideas that shape most settlements. Assets built up during the marriage (the "matrimonial" pot) are usually the starting point for an equal share; where needs, a home, an income in retirement, can't otherwise be met, the split may move away from 50/50, and sometimes non-matrimonial assets are drawn in too.
A settlement that ends all future financial claims between the couple, so neither can come back for more later. A pension share is often key to achieving one, because it divides retirement provision now rather than leaving ongoing maintenance.
Regular income paid by one former spouse to the other after divorce, where one can't yet meet their own needs. Also called periodical payments; it's separate from child maintenance.
The kind of pension matters enormously, it changes how it's valued and split.
A pension that works like a pot of money: contributions are invested, and what you get depends on how much went in and how the investments performed. Also called money purchase. The pot has a clear cash value, which makes DC pensions the more straightforward type to divide.
A pension that promises a set income for life at retirement, worked out from your salary and years of service, not from a pot of money. Because you're valuing a guaranteed lifelong income, the single transfer value a scheme quotes can badly understate what the pension is really worth. This is the type that most often needs a PODE.
A defined benefit pension where the income is based on your pay at or near the point you leave or retire, and your length of service. Common in older public-sector and large employer schemes.
A defined benefit pension based on your average pay across your whole career (revalued each year for inflation) rather than your final salary. Many public-sector schemes have moved to this basis.
Pensions such as the NHS, Teachers', Armed Forces, Police, Fire and Civil Service schemes. Many are "unfunded" (paid from current taxation, with no invested pot behind them) and can't simply be transferred out, which shapes how they must be shared. A pension in one of these almost always warrants expert input.
A defined contribution personal pension that lets the holder choose their own investments from a wide range. Just a flexible type of money-purchase pot.
An insurance product that converts a pension pot into a guaranteed income, usually for life. Once bought it generally can't be undone, so an annuity already in payment needs careful handling in a settlement.
Why the number on the statement isn't the end of the story.
The single cash value a scheme puts on a pension, you'll also see it called the transfer value, CEV or CETV. For a money-purchase pension it's usually just the pot value; for a defined benefit pension it's the scheme actuary's estimate of what the promised income is worth today. Two pensions with the same CE can still be worth very different amounts in practice, which is exactly why it can't be taken at face value.
A plain way of describing the core problem: a guaranteed income for life (a DB pension) and a pot of money (a DC pension) aren't the same thing, even if they share the same transfer value. Comparing them fairly is a big part of what a PODE does.
The size of money-purchase pot someone would need to buy an income as secure as a defined benefit pension provides. It's one way of putting a DB and a DC pension on the same footing so they can be compared like for like.
A cash-equivalent value that is recent enough (broadly, less than 12 months old) to be relied on in the court process. Older figures usually have to be refreshed.
A published set of actuarial tables that help estimate pension values and offsetting figures in a consistent way. A recognised reference tool, particularly in less complex cases.
The three main ways pensions get split, and the jargon that comes with each.
A court order that transfers a percentage of one person's pension to the other, giving each their own independent pension going forward. It's the cleanest way to divide pensions and supports a clean break.
The two sides of a pension share: the credit is the slice the receiving spouse gains, and the debit is the matching amount taken off the other spouse's pension.
Keeping the pension whole and balancing it against other assets instead, for example, one spouse keeps more of the house while the other keeps their pension. It avoids splitting the pension itself, but working out a fair trade between cash today and pension income later is genuinely tricky, and getting it wrong is a common cause of unfair outcomes.
An older approach (once called earmarking) where part of a pension is paid to the ex-spouse only when the pension holder eventually draws it. Because it doesn't give a clean break and depends on the other person's choices, it's now used far less than pension sharing.
Two different goals when splitting pensions. Equalising capital aims to give each person an equal pension value; equalising income aims to give each a similar pension income in retirement. They can produce quite different shares, especially where there's an age gap, so which one to use is a key decision in each case.
Because a pension share takes months to put into effect, the value changes between the order and the day it's actually implemented. The final amount transferred is based on a fresh valuation, not the figure the court first saw.
Where an age difference means the receiving spouse can't draw their new pension until some years after the other spouse has started drawing theirs, leaving an income gap that a fair settlement needs to account for.
Extra terms that crop up in reports and scheme paperwork.
The pension paid by the government based on your National Insurance record. Those reaching State Pension age from 6 April 2016 get the "New" State Pension; earlier retirees are on the "Old" system. State Pensions are easy to overlook but should always be part of the picture.
An earnings-related top-up to the older State Pension (you may see it called SERPS or S2P). In some circumstances part of it can be shared on divorce.
The forms you use to get an official forecast of your State Pension from the DWP. A PODE will usually ask both parties to obtain these so State Pension entitlements aren't missed.
A minimum level of pension that certain older defined benefit schemes must provide, linked to periods when members were "contracted out" of part of the State Pension. It has its own rules and can complicate a valuation.
A ruling requiring many public-sector schemes (NHS, Teachers', Police and others) to give some members a choice about which benefits they receive for service between 2015 and 2022. It can meaningfully change what a public-sector pension is worth, so it matters when valuing one.
A statutory safety net that pays compensation to members of defined benefit schemes when the employer has failed and the scheme can't pay in full. Benefits inside the PPF are usually reduced from what was originally promised.
The rules that affect when and how pension money can be taken. Figures are for the 2026/27 tax year.
The portion of a pension, usually up to 25%, that can normally be taken tax-free when you start drawing benefits. Formally the Pension Commencement Lump Sum. There's now an overall cap on tax-free lump sums of £268,275.
Taking income directly from a money-purchase pot, a bit at a time, rather than buying an annuity, leaving the rest invested. It offers flexibility but no guarantee the money will last.
The earliest age you can normally take a workplace or personal pension (other than through ill health). It's currently 55 and rises to 57 from 6 April 2028.
The most that can normally be paid into your pensions in a tax year with tax relief, £60,000 for 2026/27, or 100% of your earnings if lower. High earners can have a lower "tapered" allowance.
A reduced annual allowance, £10,000, that kicks in once you've started flexibly drawing income from a money-purchase pension, limiting how much you can pay back in.
A former cap on the total pension value you could build up before extra tax applied. It was abolished on 6 April 2024 and replaced by separate limits on tax-free lump sums (see tax-free lump sum). You may still see it referenced in older paperwork.
Take the free 2-minute check, browse the directory, or ask Phil directly. Every enquiry comes straight to him.