PODE.expert Do I need a PODE?

Case study

The scheme said the pension was worth £325,000. A fair valuation said £612,000.

How a transfer value can hide nearly half of what a defined benefit pension is really worth.

HomeCase studies › When a transfer value hides half of what a pension is worth

General information, not advice on your own case.

Based on a real case. The details have been anonymised and some figures rounded, so that no one involved can be identified.

The situation

A divorcing couple, one of them with a large private-sector final-salary pension. Asked what it was worth, the scheme did what schemes do and quoted a transfer value: about £325,000. That was the number on the table to divide or to offset against.

The obvious answer

There is the figure. Split it, or balance it against the other assets, at £325,000.

What happened

A proper fair-value calculation, what it would actually cost to buy the same guaranteed, inflation-linked income on the open market, put the pension at about £612,000. Nearly double the transfer value. The scheme's number was not "wrong"; it was simply built on the scheme's own cautious assumptions rather than on what the pension is really worth to the two people dividing it. The tell was in the income: every £1,000 of this pension bought around £105 a year of retirement income inside the scheme, while the same £1,000 moved to an ordinary personal pension would have bought only about £76 a year.

Transfer value versus fair value on a large final-salary pension Two bars. The scheme transfer value is 325,000 pounds. The fair value, the cost of buying the same income elsewhere, is 612,000 pounds, nearly double, a gap of about 287,000 pounds. CASE STUDY · A LARGE PRIVATE-SECTOR FINAL-SALARY PENSION The transfer value showed half the truth. What the scheme's transfer value said £325,000 What the pension was really worth (fair value: the cost of buying the same income elsewhere) £612,000 Nearly double a gap of about £287,000 the statement never showed Why the gap? Every £1,000 of this pension bought about £105 a year of income inside the scheme, but only about £76 a year if the money was moved to an ordinary personal pension. A guaranteed pension is worth more than its transfer value suggests, so dividing on the transfer value alone can leave a fortune invisible. PODE.expert
Transfer value against fair value for the same defined benefit pension. Tap or click to open it full size.

The number

The transfer value said £325,000. Its fair value was £612,000. Nearly £290,000 of pension wealth the statement did not show.

What it cost

Had they simply divided the £325,000 transfer value, close to £290,000 of real pension wealth would have been invisible, and the spouse without the pension would have settled for a share of a number that was itself little more than half the truth. A fair division needed a much larger share, or a much larger offset, than the transfer value implied.

The lesson

For a defined benefit or public-sector pension, the transfer value is a starting point, not the answer. It and an independent valuation are two different calculations on two different bases, so the two numbers rarely agree. In this case the gap ran one way, and it was worth nearly £290,000. It does not always run that way: for plenty of schemes the transfer value comes out higher than an independent valuation. Only a proper calculation shows which way it runs, and by how much, which is why the figure on the statement is not something to divide on unexamined.

Not sure where you stand? Start with the "Do I need a PODE?" tool.

Not sure whether you need an expert?

The free check takes about two minutes and tells you where you stand.