PODE.expert Do I need a PODE?

Case study

£350,000 in pensions, and we told them to save their money.

Why it is the kind of pension, not the size of it, that decides whether you need an expert.

HomeCase studies › It is the kind of pension, not the size, that decides if you need an expert

General information, not advice on your own case.

Based on a real case. The details have been anonymised and some figures rounded, so that no one involved can be identified.

The situation

Two spouses, both 34 and a couple of months apart in age, divorcing with around £350,000 between them in money-purchase (defined contribution) pensions. They came to us worried, because £350,000 sounds like exactly the sort of number that must need an expert.

The obvious answer

That much pension surely needs a proper report. Instruct an expert, get it valued, divide it carefully.

What happened

We looked at what they actually had, and told them to save their money. Their pensions were both defined contribution, pots of money rather than guaranteed income, and similar in size. They were young, more than thirty years from State Pension age, with decades still to build. We even checked their State Pensions: their contributions to date were the same, both were working and earning similarly, so those were on track to build up equally too. Nothing in the picture needed an actuary to untangle, and under the Pension Advisory Group's guidance (PAG2), simple, similar pots at their age do not call for a report, whatever the headline value.

When a pension expert report is not needed A couple hold 350,000 pounds of pensions between them and need no expert report, because both are money-purchase pots, similar in size, both aged 34 with over thirty years to retirement, and their State Pensions are on track to match. CASE STUDY · WHEN YOU DO NOT NEED AN EXPERT £350,000 in pensions, and no report needed. Between them £350,000 A number big enough to send most people looking for an expert. No PODE report needed Why not, under PAG2: Both are money-purchase pots, pots of money, not guaranteed pensions that need an actuary to value. Similar in size, so dividing them fairly is straightforward. Both 34, over thirty years to retirement, with plenty of time for outcomes to even out. State Pensions on track to match, same contributions so far, similar earnings, so both are building equally. It is the kind of pension, not the size, that decides. Simple, similar pots of money, especially for younger people with years left to build, can often be divided without a report, and a good expert will tell you so. PODE.expert
Why £350,000 of similar defined contribution pensions needed no expert report. Tap or click to open it full size.

The number

£350,000 of pensions, and the report they thought they needed would have added nothing.

What it cost

Nothing, because we told them not to spend it. The size of the number had frightened them; the nature of the pensions meant they could divide them fairly between themselves.

The lesson

It is not the size of the pensions that decides whether you need an expert, it is the kind. Simple, similar pots of money, especially for younger people with years left to build, can often be divided without a report, and a good expert will tell you so. The free check on this site is built to give you that same answer in a couple of minutes.

Try the "Do I need a PODE?" tool.

Not sure whether you need an expert?

The free check takes about two minutes and tells you where you stand.